Search
Close this search box.

Uganda: The Deadly Hours for Women to Give Birth

BY CAROL NATUKUNDA

Woe unto a mother who goes to deliver in Mulago hospital at night or early morning. Chances are she could die.

A new report shows that the highest number of maternal deaths (14.2%) occurs between 9 am- 10am. Other “deadly” hours to be admitted are 7-8pm, 1-2am and 9-10pm.

In other regional referral hospitals combined, the highest number of deaths (13.2%) occurred between 7-10pm, followed by the 5-6am and 1-2pm.

The revelations are contained in a report titled “maternal mortality reviews in three referral hospitals in Uganda” 2009-2011. About 300 deaths of mothers were reviewed in Fort portal, Masaka and Mulago referral Hospitals.

According to the report, these time periods, in which mothers died relate to health worker fatigue and the periods of changeover of the medical staff.

Although 42% mothers died within 24 hours of admission, 20% died in the first six hours of admission. These were considered as the “walk in” dead, which suggested that they came to hospital when it was a little too late and nothing little could be done for them.

The report is the first of its kind and was carried out by the Association of Gynecologist and Obstetrics in Uganda, to explore why women continue to die in labour. An estimated 6,000 women die every year due to birth related problems.

Months of death

Overall, many mothers admitted at Mulago Hospital died in January and in July. These two months a number of changes on the calendar- the university examinations and holidays for the lecturers and some medical students, as well as recruitment of new interns.

“These personnel changes, impacted on the quality of services, provided at these hospitals,” the report states.

Furthermore, June and July was cited as the end of the financial year, and the hospitals were generally faced with challenges in procurement of essential supplies.

Causes of death

Presenting the findings at a conference on Thursday, Dr. Jolly Beyeza, a senior gynecologist and obstetrician said heavy bleeding ranked the highest cause of mortality at these hospitals, which often resulted from complications in labor, and delivery.

Other top complications, according to Beyeza were abortion, infections, and hypertentive disease in pregnancy. “Among mothers who died from abortion and ectopic related conditions had never had any antenatal care,” said Dr. Beyeza. Among the mothers whose mode of delivery was recorded, 11% died undelivered. Seven mothers were brought in hospitals when they were already dead, while the majority of mothers who came in with abortion or after delivery were critically ill.

Should abortion be legalized?

During the conference, participants debated on whether to legalise abortion or not.

Joy Asasira, a lawyer with the Center for Women’s Rights and Development said a lot of women are unnecessarily dying from crude methods of abortion.

“If a woman wants to have an abortion, it does not matter what the law says. She’ll have it anyway,” Asasira said.

“Many people don’t want to talk about it, but it happens. If you don’t talk about abortion, yet we want to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of improving maternal health, we are deceiving ourselves,” she added.

Asasira argued that the government was spending sh7.5billion every year to treat complications resulting from unsafe abortions. The World Health Organization estimates that in Uganda, about 300,000 abortions are carried out every year.

Statistics show that the use of contraceptives is still low in Uganda. About 26% of women in Uganda are using modern contraception methods, while about 16 women die every day due to maternal health problems, including abortion.

Asasira stressed that nearly all unsafe abortions are because of unwanted pregnancies.

She also acknowledged that while the law in Uganda does not criminalize abortion, terminating a pregnancy had to be done within constraints of the law.

Quoting Section 224 of the Penal Code Act, Asasira said: “The law doesn’t prohibit abortion absolutely. It has a provision that acknowledges that to save the life of a mother, in case of a severe illness, that is threatening the life of a mother; a safe abortion should be carried out. But most people are not aware of this fact.”

However, doctors were skeptic, arguing that if safe abortion is readily available, women might choose to use it as a form of family planning, rather than an emergency solution to an unwanted pregnancy.

“The best thing is preventing pregnancy itself. You cannot start solving a problem from the bottom of it. Even if you made removal of pregnancy available, women will decide to use abortion as a family planning method,” argued Prof Donald Amoko, a Ugandan gynecologist based in South Africa.

Dr, James Batwala, a senior consultant obstetrician and gynecology was also pessimistic. “I am sure as we talk now; abortion is going on either legally or illegally. When you think about it, a woman has a right [to abort]. But what about the child? Don’t they have a right to life? We need to draw a line. What is more important right now is that abortion is a killer,” Batwala said.

Reacting to the concerns, Asasira, argued: “As a lawyer, rights begin at birth. I am a woman, I love babies, but there are some issues beyond the woman.”

What mothers say

The median age at death was 25 years. According to the study, only 57% of women in Uganda deliver in a health facility. “We are wondering. Where do the rest go?” asked Beyeza.

Many mothers cite lack of transport from home to the health facilities in time, staff lacking expertise and shortage of doctors among others. But doctors also complained that patients came to hospital when it was way too late. They also lacked essential facilities in health centers to carry out emergencies.

Way forward

Participants noted that most the complications were treatable. Dr. Florence Mirembe, a gynecologist said involving men in the maternal health fight would make a difference. “The men need to walk with us,” she said.

The ministry of health permanent sectary Dr. Asuman Lukwago said the government was committed to give more resources to the sector. He also announced that a women’s hospital at Mulago Hospital would be ready within two years, and called for the need for training of more gynecologists and obstetricians to work at the center.

Frank Tumwebaze, the incoming minister of presidency said the government would look into recruitment of midwives. He also called on parliament to advocate aggressively for the increase of doctors and nurses salaries, saying it would make them motivated.

Source: http://allafrica.com/stories/201209220493.html

Monitor investigation reveals health sector in a sorry state

Standards of public health care are in free fall as fresh evidence now points at the acute shortage of sick-beds, especially in intensive care units, forcing doctors to discharge patients prematurely.

A Daily Monitor investigation has found that there are only 37 intensive care unit beds in the country, with 12 in Mulago National Referral Hospital. The hospital beds (per 1,000 people) were last reported at 0.50 in 2010, according to a 2012 World Bank report.

A doctor in Mulago who only agreed to speak off the record, said “discharge decisions are made with bed-capacity constraints in mind.” The doctor said the push to get patients out of the beds is based on the crucial need to save “those who are badly off” using the few resources available.

Some patients with serious illnesses are left unattended to for weeks and access to drugs and feeding in public hospitals remains a challenge for many.

Premier Amama Mbabazi told Parliament on Thursday that government is aware of the challenges in the health sector and blamed the crisis on a “limited resource envelope”. The country’s growing budget is now at Shs11.4 trillion but has yet to find a panacea for the overburdened public healthcare system.

At public hospitals, the few doctors and nurses available are struggling to cope.Arua Regional Referral Hospital, which covers all West Nile districts and also DR Congo and Southern Sudan, has only 15 doctors, including the director, who is mostly doing administrative work.

This means that the doctor to patient ratio is 1:178,600, while the recommended World Health Organisation ratio is 1:12,500. There were 56 vacancies at the hospital most of which were critical in service delivery.

In Kabale Hospital, the situation is not different. The hospital on average admits 1,805 patients yet it had only 310 beds. One doctor attends to over 9,000 patients and one nurse supervises over 400 people.

The hospital also lacks adequate space in the maternity ward, an accident and emergency unit and incinerator to safely dispose of bio-waste. The old sewage system and toilet facilities cannot match the ever increasing number of patients.

Jinja hospital risks disconnection after it accumulated domestic arrears of Shs.454.1m in respect of water bills out of which Shs93.2m relate to 2010/11 financial year.
While this situation severely undermines public health service dispensation, the management of Arua hospital said they had reported the matter to the Health ministry but no action has been taken to fill the vacant posts for doctors.

The government has slapped a ban on recruitment of health workers citing financial constraints. This means that undermanned hospitals, can only recruit to replace those who have either resigned or died in the line of duty.

The March 2012 report of the Auditor General calls for radical action to reorganise hospital care so that “Ugandans receive the care they deserve”. Three-quarters of doctors are under more pressure now than they were 10 years ago, and nurses report an unmanageable workload.

Health Service Commission Chairman Pius Okong has warned of a “disaster” if government doesn’t lift the ban on recruitment.

While appearing before the Health Committee of Parliament, Prof. Okong said: “If we don’t recruit, the manpower crisis in the health sector will be compounded. Some facilities have less than 30 per cent staffing level which is untenable.”

The Director General of Health Services, Dr Jane Aceng, puts medical staffing levels at 58 per cent. Dr Sam Lyomoki, the chairperson of Health Committee, has proposed that an additional Shs260b be allocated to the health sector to boost staffing level to at least 66 percent.
Parliament heard last week that the hospital care was under intense pressure, leading to unnecessary indignity and distress. But government insists it needs more time to agree to the Shs39.2b the House Budget Committee found from cuts out of the Shs260b needed to fix the system.

Source: http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Monitor+investigation+reveals+health+sector+in+a+sorry+state/-/688334/1509184/-/11o9rn0/-/index.html

More than 500 abortions in Gulu last year, says report

By Cissy Makumbi 

Gulu hospital management has called for government intervention following the release of a report showing an increase in cases of abortion in the district.

The report released on Wednesday shows that up to 568 babies were aborted in the year 2011/2012.

The authorities, who compiled the report, say there is need to save the unborn babies from the practice, common among girls who have unprotected sex for money.

In 2010/2011, about 500 unborn babies were terminated, according to the same report, although it still remains unclear whether the culprits were brought to book, since the practice is a crime under the law.

The director of the hospital, Dr Anthony Onyach, however, attributed the increase in the vice to failure by many mothers to use family planning methods, thus conceiving against their will.

“Most abortions occur among girls who report to the hospital when they are very sick after administering herbs and other drugs on themselves, while others seek help from shrines,” Mr Onyach said.

The same report indicates a drastic decline in the number of mothers seeking family planning services at the health facility. It shows that although in 2010/2011 there were at least 1,239 mothers who visited the hospital’s family planning unit, in 2011/2012, the number reduced to only 770.

Health experts attribute the increasing number of women with cervical cancer to unsafe abortions. Under the law, abortion is illegal and punishable, a situation that sees many women do it undercover with support from ill-equipped health personnel and traditional healers.

The Ministry of Health is considering the recommendations of a report it commissioned into the safety and legality of abortion. The report proposes legalising abortion in specific cases such as rape.

However, the debate on legalising abortion has not been met with open arms, with the proposal opposed by many Ugandans, most arguments based on religious, cultural and moral grounds

Source: http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/More+than+500+abortions+in+Gulu+last+year++says+report/-/688334/1506654/-/vx98ym/-/index.html

Limp courts have potential to undermine human rights

CARMEL RICKARD

carmelrickard.posterous.com

IF you want to see what a toothless court looks like – and what happens when such a court guards people’s rights – turn your eyes northwards to Uganda. Its appeal court, which doubles as a constitutional court when required, has delivered a decision that makes for sobering reading.

It deals with a “petition” brought by, among others, relatives of two women who died in childbirth under horrific circumstances at state health institutions.

The petition has made legal history as it’s the first challenge to government health policies and practices brought under Uganda’s 1995 constitution.

An estimated 100 Ugandan women die in childbirth every week, a statistic that prompted the Centre for Health, Human Rights and Development to compile an extensive constitutional petition citing international law and human rights conventions as well as Uganda’s own constitution.

Two months ago, five judges, headed by the deputy chief justice, considered the petition but refused to deal with it.

The petition said the public was affected by the non-provision of crucial resources for women giving birth in government health facilities, as well as by the “unethical behaviour” of doctors and nurses towards expectant mothers, and asked that the situation be declared unconstitutional.

Backed by more than 50 non-government organisations, the petition included a list of constitutional sections infringed by the inadequate provision of proper health services for women giving birth.

There’s no shortage of clauses to which you could appeal in making such a petition – the right to life, for one – plus there’s a section saying that anyone who alleges that an “act or omission by any person or authority is inconsistent with or in contravention” of the constitution, may “petition the constitutional court for a declaration to that effect and for redress where appropriate”.

When the case was argued, however, the state attorney said the petition should be rejected on the basis of the “political question” doctrine, without even getting to the merits of the issues involved.

If the court agreed to deal with the petition, she argued, it would be “interfering with political discretion by which law is a preserve of the executive and the legislature”.

The constitutional court agreed: it might be true that not enough resources had been allocated to maternal health care services, but the court “has no power to determine or enforce its jurisdiction on matters that require analysis of the health sector government policies, (or) it will be substituting its discretion for that of the executive”.

The judge said a different approach should have been adopted with an application to the high court for redress – suing the state, in other words.

After the court threw out the case, human rights activists said it had at least “raised awareness” of the problem. Perhaps, but not where it matters most.

A month afterwards, Hajara Katusabe, 24, died in labour when the midwife at a health centre refused to emerge to help her because she “had a heavy workload” and was tired.

After Katusabe died, members of the local community are reported to have stormed the health centre, threatening to lynch the midwife.

She was rescued by riot police, but has since been charged with negligence.

Now those behind the original petition have appealed to Uganda’s highest tribunal, the supreme court. Lobbyists say if they lose here, too, they will approach the African court on human and people’s rights.

Perhaps under Ugandan jurisprudence the constitutional court was indeed correct – and it’s not the apex court on such matters as in SA. The supreme court might rule differently.

But reading the judgment made me pause: suppose

our Constitutional Court had refused to rule in the Treatment Action Campaign case, to name just one.

Imagine that instead of saying that it was unreasonable for the government to provide life-sustaining medicine at just a few pilot sites instead of being widely available, the court had said it could not intervene in policy matters.

How many people, alive now, would have died?

When it comes to socio-economic and environmental rights, our Constitutional Court is crucial to ensuring that the state carries out its duty, that these rights are not neglected and that the poorest or most vulnerable, often without the political clout that would ensure attention from a ruling party, also benefit from the promises of the constitution.

Source: http://www.iol.co.za/the-star/limp-courts-have-potential-to-undermine-human-rights-1.1382060#.UFM2mbIgqot

Indian patent rules infuriate Big Pharma

A CLASH over India’s drug market was inevitable. Foreign drugmakers, facing paltry growth in the West, are eyeing India hungrily. Rising incomes and rates of chronic disease may push sales from $12 billion in 2010 to $74 billion in 2020, according to PwC, a consultancy. But tapping this growth means having patents that protect intellectual property. India is home to a thriving generics industry, whose copycat drugs make up about 90% of the market. India’s drug-patent laws are just seven years old. Its government is keen to encourage generics and keep prices down.

Now India’s patent rules are being put to the test. Novartis, a Swiss giant, is challenging India for denying a patent for Glivec, its blockbuster cancer drug. The fight is due to reach India’s Supreme Court on September 11th. Bayer, a German drugmaker, has a different problem: in March India’s patent controller ordered it to license a drug to a local manufacturer. Its appeal had its first hearing on September 3rd. The cases will help decide how quickly India’s 1.2 billion people get new drugs, and at what price.

India’s drug industry has a unique history. For more than 30 years, the country did not recognise pharmaceutical patents. Domestic firms became masters at copying medicine and making it cheaply. After joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995, India had to change its patent policy. But its new system, in place since 2005, includes special protections for both patients and generic manufacturers.

For example, the law bars patents of minor changes to existing drugs, a practice known as “evergreening”. Drug reformulations are often used to extend patents elsewhere; they get no protection in India. The country also has broad criteria for “compulsory licensing”. A WTO agreement allows countries, in some instances, to force a firm to license a patented drug to a generic company. India’s rules give officials broad powers to do this.

Now both provisions are under attack. In 2006 India denied Novartis a patent for Glivec, calling it an unpatentable modification of an existing substance, imatinib. Novartis insists this is nonsense. Only by making it in salt form, imatinib mesylate, did Novartis have a proper drug: the body absorbed the medicine 30% more easily.

Paul Herrling, the chair of Novartis’s Institute for Tropical Diseases, says the case is a test of what is patentable in India. “We are being accused of evergreening,” he says. “Having that concept applied to Glivec, which was one of the major breakthroughs in cancer therapies, is completely ridiculous.” Michelle Childs of Médecins Sans Frontières, a non-profit, retorts that drug firms such as Novartis should not win patents for minor improvements. This would keep generics off the market, driving up prices.

Bayer’s case is equally heated. In 2008 it won an Indian patent for Nexavar, a kidney-cancer drug. But in March India’s patent controller issued the country’s first compulsory licence. He wrote that Bayer had not made Nexavar “reasonably affordable” (Bayer offered it for a whopping $5,000 a month), that the company failed to provide enough of the drug and, in a protectionist nod, reckoned that importing Nexavar further hurt Bayer’s case. The controller ordered an Indian company, Natco, to sell Nexavar for one-thirtieth of Bayer’s price. Bayer will receive a 6% royalty. Meanwhile Bayer is fending off another competitor, Cipla, which has sold generic Nexavar in India for years.

As these cases drag on, India’s government is considering other ways to get cheaper medicine. It plans to offer free generics in public hospitals, which would drive up sales of very cheap copies. It may also set price controls for patented drugs. However, generic companies are not immune to regulatory pressure. Ministers plan to expand price controls for a broader swathe of generics.

Cost versus innovation

 

 

“We realise the industry will take a hit,” explains D.G. Shah of the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, which represents big generic companies. “We’re trying to find a solution so that the government’s concerns on access and affordability are addressed without threatening the long-term growth of the pharmaceutical industry.” Nice work, if they can get it.

Source: http://www.economist.com/node/21562226